The effect of joint mobilization of Maitland on chronic ankle instability: A randomized trial.
Featured on Physle Daily · Wednesday, 29 July 2026
Researchers in this 2024 trial wanted to see whether Maitland joint mobilization, a hands-on manual therapy technique, could help people with chronic ankle instability when added to standard rehabilitation. They split 76 people with this condition into two groups: one received conventional rehab alone, and the other received the same conventional rehab plus eight weeks of Maitland treatment. Both groups improved across multiple measures including pain, ankle movement, balance, and everyday function after eight weeks.
The group that received Maitland therapy on top of conventional rehab showed somewhat greater improvements across almost every measure they tracked. The findings suggest that combining manual therapy with standard exercises may produce better outcomes than exercises alone, though the study design means we should be cautious about how broadly we generalize these results.
This study looked at whether a specific hands-on therapy called Maitland mobilization could help people recover better from chronic ankle instability, the kind of ongoing ankle problems that keep coming back or won't fully heal. Researchers compared two groups of people: one did standard exercises and rehabilitation, while the other did those same exercises plus received eight weeks of direct manual therapy from a physiotherapist who mobilized the ankle joint using specific techniques.
After eight weeks, both groups felt less pain and could move their ankles better and do more in daily life and sports. The group that added the manual therapy showed somewhat better improvements in pain, movement, balance, and function than the group doing exercises alone.
While this is encouraging, one study with 76 people is a beginning rather than a definitive answer, and your own recovery may depend on many factors beyond what this research captured.
This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.
This randomized controlled trial adds modest evidence that Maitland mobilization may complement conventional rehabilitation for chronic ankle instability. The study was reasonably well designed with 76 participants, baseline equivalence between groups, and outcome measures spanning pain (visual analogue scale), range of motion (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, and varus), dynamic balance (Y-balance test), and functional ability across both daily living and sport domains.
Both groups improved substantially over eight weeks, which is expected and aligns with what we know about rehab efficacy. The experimental group demonstrated statistically significant greater improvements across all measured domains.
What remains unclear is whether the added benefit is clinically meaningful in practice, how the effect persists beyond eight weeks, which patients might benefit most, or what specific Maitland techniques drove the improvements. Single-center, single-blinded design limits generalizability, and the abstract does not report effect sizes or confidence intervals, making it difficult to judge the magnitude of the advantage.
This paper provides a reasonable signpost that manual mobilization combined with exercise warrants further investigation rather than a strong directive for practice.
Both conventional rehabilitation alone and conventional rehabilitation plus Maitland mobilization resulted in significant improvements in pain, ankle range of motion, balance, and functional ability over eight weeks.
The group receiving Maitland mobilization added to conventional rehabilitation showed statistically significantly greater improvements than the conventional rehabilitation only group across pain, motion, balance, daily living function, and sport function.
This single-center randomized trial of 76 people suggests that combining Maitland joint mobilization with standard exercises may produce somewhat better short-term outcomes than standard exercises alone for chronic ankle instability.
Source
Medicine
Tang F, Yin S, Gao P et al. · 2024
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039100