Swedish massage versus hip strengthening exercises for pain and function in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
Featured on Physle Daily · Thursday, 1 October 2026
Knee osteoarthritis in older adults often means a slow slide into stiffness, pain, and reduced independence, so finding accessible home-based treatments matters. This trial compared Swedish massage, hip strengthening exercises, and a control group over eight weeks in adults over 60 with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, looking at pain, range of motion, and daily function. Both massage and hip strengthening led to reductions in pain and improvements in function and knee flexion range of motion compared with control, with similar-sized effects between the two active treatments. Massage also showed a somewhat larger improvement in daily function than hip strengthening, though the abstract does not report whether the two active treatments were directly compared with each other statistically.
The trial was small, home-based, and the control group received no comparable attention or home visits, so part of the benefit seen with either active treatment may reflect increased contact or expectation rather than the treatment itself.
If you're an older adult living with knee osteoarthritis, you know how much pain and stiffness can limit daily movement. This study looked at whether two different home-based treatments, a form of relaxing massage or exercises that strengthen the hip muscles, could help more than no treatment at all, over eight weeks. Both treatments were linked to less pain, better daily function, and more knee bending ability compared with the group that received neither treatment.
Massage showed a slightly bigger improvement in daily activities like walking and climbing stairs, but the study doesn't tell us whether massage worked better than hip strengthening in a direct comparison, so we can't say one is clearly superior. The study was relatively small, and the people in the comparison group didn't receive any special attention or home visits, so some of the benefit seen could come from having regular contact with researchers rather than from the treatments themselves. Still, both approaches appeared safe, with no serious problems reported.
This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.
This trial addresses a practical clinical question: for older adults with knee osteoarthritis who may struggle to access clinic-based care, do home-delivered Swedish massage or hip strengthening exercises offer measurable benefit over no intervention? Seventy-five participants over 60 were randomized to Swedish massage, hip strengthening exercises, or control for eight weeks, with 70 completing the study and adherence above 85 percent. Both active interventions produced statistically significant improvements over control in pain (VAS), function (KOOS-ADL), and active knee flexion range of motion, with moderate effect sizes (d approximately 0.65 to 0.77) and confidence intervals excluding zero. Swedish massage showed a somewhat larger KOOS-ADL improvement than hip strengthening, but the abstract does not report a direct statistical comparison between the two active arms, so it remains unclear whether massage genuinely outperforms hip strengthening for function or whether this reflects between-group variability. The control group received no home visits or therapist contact, so the observed benefits may partly reflect attention or expectation effects rather than treatment-specific mechanisms.
No serious adverse events were reported, but the trial's small sample, single setting, and short follow-up limit generalizability regarding durability of effects or applicability to frailer or more severely affected populations.
Both Swedish massage and hip strengthening exercises significantly reduced pain and improved knee flexion range of motion compared with a no-treatment control group over eight weeks.
Swedish massage showed a slightly larger improvement in daily function (KOOS-ADL) than hip strengthening exercises, but the abstract does not report a direct statistical comparison between the two active treatments.
The trial was relatively small (70 participants completing an 8-week home program), and the control group received no comparable attention or contact, so part of the observed benefit may reflect nonspecific effects rather than the treatments themselves.
Source
Aging clinical and experimental research
Asgarimoghadam A, Ravari A, Mirzaei T et al. · 2026
doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03313-z