Positional release therapy and therapeutic massage reduce muscle trigger and tender points.
Featured on Physle Daily · Monday, 12 October 2026
Trigger points in the upper trapezius, those tender, tight spots near the neck and shoulder, are a common source of pain, and two manual therapy approaches, positional release therapy and therapeutic massage, are both used to treat them. This trial compared the two directly in 60 healthy adults, measuring pain, pressure sensitivity, muscle thickness and stiffness before treatment, right after, and 48 hours later. Both treatments reduced pain and briefly decreased muscle stiffness. Positional release therapy showed lower pain scores and less pressure sensitivity at both follow-up points, but the study does not report whether this difference between the two treatments reached statistical significance, so it remains a trend rather than a confirmed advantage.
Notably, in male participants neither treatment kept muscle stiffness reduced by 48 hours, highlighting that short-term relief may not last.
If you've ever had a tight, sore knot in your shoulder near your neck, you know how uncomfortable trigger points can be. This study looked at two hands-on treatments for them, a gentler technique called positional release therapy and a more familiar approach, therapeutic massage, testing them in 60 healthy adults with shoulder tightness. Both treatments helped reduce pain and briefly eased muscle stiffness.
The positional release group showed somewhat better pain relief and less tenderness at the time of treatment and two days later, but the researchers did not report whether this difference between the two treatments was statistically meaningful, so it is best seen as a trend rather than a confirmed effect. Also worth knowing is that in male participants, the muscle-stiffness improvement did not last by the two-day mark for either treatment, meaning any benefit to muscle tissue itself may be short-lived.
This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.
This trial addresses a practical question clinicians face when managing upper trapezius trigger points: does positional release therapy offer any advantage over the more established therapeutic massage? Sixty healthy participants with palpable trigger points were randomised to one treatment, with pain (visual analog scale), pressure pain threshold, muscle thickness (B-mode ultrasound) and stiffness (shear-wave elastography) measured at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 48 hours later. Both interventions produced within-group improvements in pain and an acute reduction in stiffness. Positional release therapy showed numerically better pain and pressure sensitivity outcomes at both follow-up points, but the abstract reports no statistical comparison between groups, so this should be read as a trend that could reflect chance rather than a demonstrated superiority.
The finding that stiffness reduction was not sustained at 48 hours in males across both treatments raises questions about the durability of mechanical tissue effects, independent of reported pain relief. The study does not establish long-term clinical outcomes, was conducted in healthy volunteers rather than a clinical pain population, and gives no information on adverse events. These limitations should temper any translation into firm treatment preference.
In a randomised trial of 60 adults with upper trapezius trigger points, both positional release therapy and therapeutic massage reduced pain and acutely decreased muscle stiffness within groups.
Positional release therapy showed lower pain averages and reduced pressure sensitivity at both post-treatment and 48 hours later, but the abstract does not report whether this difference between groups was statistically significant.
Neither treatment maintained the acute reduction in muscle stiffness at the 48-hour follow-up in male participants, suggesting the stiffness benefit may not persist.
Source
Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
Bethers AH, Swanson DC, Sponbeck JK et al. · 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.07.005