Home Training for Cerebellar Ataxias: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Featured on Physle Daily · Sunday, 11 October 2026
People with cerebellar ataxia, a condition affecting balance and coordination, are typically advised to do balance training, but whether more demanding aerobic exercise helps has been unclear. This trial compared home-based high-intensity aerobic exercise with home-based balance exercises, both done for 30 minutes five times a week over a year, in 62 adults with various forms of cerebellar ataxia. The aerobic group showed significantly greater improvement in ataxia symptom scores, fatigue, and fitness levels than the balance group. However, among those assigned to aerobic training, benefits tended to fade in people who later cut back or stopped exercising, while those who kept training maintained their gains at one year.
This is a single-center trial with modest enrollment, and support calls were only provided for the first six months, which may have affected longer-term adherence and results.
If you or someone you care about lives with cerebellar ataxia, a condition that affects balance and movement coordination, you may have heard that balance exercises are the main recommended therapy. This study asked whether a more intense type of exercise, aerobic training done at home, could help more. Researchers compared two groups doing 30 minutes of exercise five days a week for a year, one group doing aerobic exercise and the other doing balance exercises.
The group doing aerobic training showed greater improvement in ataxia symptoms, less fatigue, and better fitness than the balance group. People who kept up the aerobic training over the full year held onto these benefits, while those who cut back saw their improvements fade.
This was a fairly small study done at one center, and extra phone support was only given for the first six months, so it's not clear how these results would hold up with less support or in other settings.
This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.
This trial addresses a specific clinical question for rehabilitation planning in cerebellar ataxia: whether high-intensity aerobic exercise offers advantages over the guideline-endorsed balance training approach. In this assessor-masked, randomized comparison of 62 adults with various ataxia types, home aerobic training produced significantly greater improvement on the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia than dose-matched balance training over 12 months, along with greater improvements in fatigue and Vo2max, all reported with between-group statistical comparisons. A notable secondary finding was that within the aerobic group, those who sustained training maintained SARA score gains at one year, while those who reduced or stopped training saw benefits trend back toward baseline.
This is a within-group adherence observation, not a randomized comparison, and should be interpreted with corresponding caution regarding causal attribution to continued exercise itself. The abstract does not report adverse events, so no safety conclusions can be drawn. Study support calls were provided only for the first six months of this 12-month trial, which may limit how adherence and outcomes generalize to settings with different support structures.
The single-center design and modest sample size also warrant caution before generalizing these findings broadly across ataxia populations.
In this randomized trial, home high-intensity aerobic training produced significantly greater improvement in ataxia symptom scores than dose-matched home balance training over 12 months (between-group β, -1.53 points; P=.001).
The aerobic group also showed significantly greater improvement in fatigue and aerobic fitness (Vo2max) compared with the balance group, both secondary outcomes.
Benefits from aerobic training were not automatically lasting: participants who continued training maintained their gains at one year, while those who reduced or stopped training trended back toward baseline, a within-group adherence-related finding rather than a randomized comparison.
Source
JAMA neurology
Barbuto S, Lee S, Stein J et al. · 2025
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3421