Efficacy of Dry Needling and Acupuncture in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Featured on Physle Daily · Monday, 10 August 2026
Fibromyalgia involves chronic widespread pain along with fatigue, sleep problems, and reduced quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis asked whether dry needling or acupuncture, two needle-based therapies, help improve pain and function in people with fibromyalgia. Researchers searched four databases and included 25 randomized controlled trials, four testing dry needling and twenty-one testing acupuncture, then combined the evidence through qualitative and systematic synthesis. Across these studies, both dry needling and acupuncture were associated with improvements in pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, stiffness, sleep quality, and quality of life in the short term.
Most included studies had acceptable methodological quality, though the authors note that no study directly compared dry needling against acupuncture, and long-term effects were not established. This means the findings reflect short-term, technique-specific improvements rather than a clear picture of which approach works better or whether benefits persist over time.
If you live with fibromyalgia, a condition marked by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, sleep trouble, and lower quality of life, you may wonder whether needle-based treatments like dry needling or acupuncture can help. This review combined results from 25 randomized controlled trials, four using dry needling and twenty-one using acupuncture, to look at their effects on pain and daily functioning. The combined evidence found that both treatments were linked to improvements in pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, stiffness, sleep quality, and quality of life, but only in the short term.
Most of the studies were judged to have acceptable quality, which supports some confidence in these findings. However, no study directly compared dry needling with acupuncture, so it isn't clear which one works better or whether one is more suitable for particular symptoms. The reviewers also point out that long-term outcomes still need to be studied, so what happens beyond the short term remains unknown.
This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled 25 randomized controlled trials examining dry needling (4 studies) and acupuncture (21 studies) in fibromyalgia, assessing outcomes including pain, pain pressure thresholds, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and disability. The authors report that most included trials had acceptable methodological quality, and both interventions were associated with short-term improvements across these domains. A key limitation for clinical interpretation is that no trial directly compared dry needling to acupuncture, so relative efficacy between the two techniques cannot be determined from this body of evidence.
The review also emphasizes that long-term efficacy has not been established, since the included studies appear to focus on short-term outcomes only. Given the imbalance in study numbers (four dry needling versus twenty-one acupuncture trials), conclusions about dry needling specifically rest on a much smaller evidence base. Overall, the synthesis supports short-term symptom improvement with either needle-based approach in fibromyalgia, but the absence of head-to-head comparisons and long-term follow-up data limits the strength of any inference about which technique to prioritize or how durable these effects might be.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials (4 on dry needling, 21 on acupuncture) evaluated their effects in fibromyalgia.
Both dry needling and acupuncture were associated with short-term improvements in pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, stiffness, sleep quality, and quality of life.
No included study directly compared dry needling with acupuncture, and long-term efficacy was not established, limiting conclusions about which approach is preferable or how lasting effects are.
Source
International journal of environmental research and public health
Valera-Calero JA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Navarro-Santana MJ et al. · 2022
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169904