Pain Neuroscience Education Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair for Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Featured on Physle Daily · Tuesday, 25 August 2026
After rotator cuff surgery, recovery isn't just physical. Fear of movement, worry about pain, and low mood can all shape how well someone does in rehab. This trial looked at whether adding pain neuroscience education, which teaches patients about how pain works in the nervous system, to a standard six-week physiotherapy program after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair would improve outcomes compared with physiotherapy alone. Both groups improved on pain and disability by similar amounts, so the education did not add a detectable benefit there.
But the group that received pain neuroscience education showed greater improvement in pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and fear of movement. This suggests the education mainly helped with the psychological side of recovery rather than pain intensity or physical function itself. The trial was small, with only 36 participants split between two groups, so these findings should be seen as an early signal rather than a settled answer.
If you've had rotator cuff surgery, you know recovery involves more than just healing tissue. How you feel about your pain, whether you're anxious about movement, or worried about reinjury can all play a role.
This study tested whether teaching patients about how pain works in the body and brain, alongside regular physiotherapy, made a difference compared with physiotherapy alone. The results showed that adding this education didn't change how much pain or disability improved, both groups did about the same there. However, patients who received the education showed greater improvement in how much they catastrophized about pain, plus less anxiety, depression, and fear of movement.
This suggests the education may help with the emotional and psychological experience of recovery, even if it doesn't change pain levels or physical function measurably. This was a small study with only 36 people total, so it's an early finding rather than a conclusion. Larger studies would help confirm whether this approach reliably helps patients recovering from this type of surgery.
This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.
This double-blind randomised controlled trial compared six weeks of conventional physiotherapy alone (n=18) against physiotherapy plus weekly pain neuroscience education sessions (n=18) in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Primary outcomes were pain and disability; secondary outcomes covered catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia, and quality of life. Between-group improvement was statistically greater in the experimental group for pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and kinesiophobia (P<0.05), while pain, disability, and quality of life improved comparably in both groups with no statistically significant difference detected.
This pattern indicates that the added education influenced psychological constructs associated with chronic pain without producing a measurable additional effect on pain intensity or functional disability in this cohort. The sample size of 36 total participants is small, limiting precision and generalisability, and the abstract does not report effect sizes, confidence intervals, or long-term follow-up beyond the six-week posttreatment assessment. Blinding is described as double-blind, though details of what was blinded are not specified in the abstract.
These findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence for a selective psychological benefit rather than a robust, broadly applicable effect on recovery after rotator cuff repair.
In this small trial of 36 patients, adding pain neuroscience education to physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair produced statistically significant greater improvements in pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and kinesiophobia compared with physiotherapy alone.
No statistically significant between-group difference was found for pain, disability, or quality of life, meaning the education did not show an added benefit on these primary outcomes.
With only 18 participants per group, this trial is small and should be considered preliminary evidence, warranting larger studies before drawing firm conclusions.
Source
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
Kararti C, Özyurt F, Kodak Mİ et al. · 2024
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002481