Physle Daily
Chronic Pain Randomised controlled trial

Effects of mirror therapy in post-traumatic complex regional pain syndrome type-1: a randomized controlled study.

Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 can develop after a hand injury, causing pain, swelling, and stiffness that are often hard to treat. Mirror therapy, where a patient watches the reflection of their unaffected hand to trick the brain during movement, has been proposed as an add-on treatment, so researchers tested whether adding it to standard rehabilitation improved outcomes for people with this post-traumatic condition. In this small randomized trial, 40 patients were split between a group receiving mirror therapy alongside routine physical therapy and a group receiving routine therapy alone, over four weeks of daily sessions. Both groups improved over time in pain, grip and pinch strength, wrist swelling, hand dexterity, and daily hand activities.

However, when the two groups were compared directly, no statistically significant difference was found between them on any outcome. This suggests that in this trial, mirror therapy did not add detectable extra benefit beyond standard rehabilitation, though the small sample size limits how confidently that conclusion can be drawn.

If you or someone you know has developed complex regional pain syndrome type 1 after a hand injury, you may have heard of mirror therapy, a technique where you watch your uninjured hand's reflection while moving it, aiming to influence pain processing in the brain. This study looked at whether adding mirror therapy to standard hand rehabilitation made a difference for people recovering from this painful, trauma-related condition. Both groups in the study, one doing standard therapy alone and one adding mirror therapy, improved over the four weeks in pain levels, grip strength, hand swelling, dexterity, and ability to use the hand for daily tasks.

But when researchers compared the two groups directly, they found no statistically significant difference between them, meaning mirror therapy did not show an added effect beyond standard care in this trial. This was a small study with only 40 people, so the findings should be seen as limited evidence rather than a final answer. It doesn't rule out that mirror therapy could help in other contexts, but this particular trial didn't detect an extra benefit.

This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.

This single-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled 40 patients with trauma-induced complex regional pain syndrome type 1 of the hand, randomizing 20 to routine rehabilitation plus mirror therapy and 20 to routine rehabilitation alone, over 20 sessions across four weeks. Outcomes assessed were pain (numeric rating scale), grip and pinch strength, hand and wrist circumference, dexterity, hand activity performance, and health-related quality of life, measured at baseline, post-treatment, and four-week follow-up. Both groups showed statistically significant within-group improvements across pain, strength, circumference, dexterity, and hand activities (p<0.05).

Critically, between-group comparisons of the magnitude of improvement showed no statistically significant differences for any outcome (p>0.05), indicating that adding mirror therapy did not produce a detectable additional effect over routine therapy alone in this sample. The trial's small size (n=40) limits statistical power to detect between-group differences, and the abstract does not report effect sizes, confidence intervals, or blinding details beyond single-blind design, restricting judgments about precision or risk of bias. Findings should be interpreted as a null result for an additive effect of mirror therapy in this specific population and dosing protocol, without extrapolation to other CRPS presentations or intervention protocols.

1

In this randomized trial of 40 patients, both the mirror therapy group and the control group showed statistically significant improvements in pain, strength, dexterity, and hand activities after four weeks.

2

No statistically significant difference was found between the mirror therapy and control groups for any outcome measured, indicating no detected additional benefit from mirror therapy.

3

With only 40 participants total, this trial provides limited statistical power, so the null between-group finding should be regarded as preliminary rather than conclusive.

Source

Journal of rehabilitation medicine

Özdemir EC, Elhan AH, Küçükdeveci AA · 2024

doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40417

Read paper →
Previously in Chronic Pain
2026-09-02The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Approaches in Chronic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2026-09-01Effectiveness of nonpharmacological conservative therapies for chronic pelvic pain in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2026-08-31Total Hip Replacement or Resistance Training for Severe Hip Osteoarthritis. Browse the full Chronic Pain archive →
A note on accuracy

Summaries are AI-generated from each paper's abstract and are for learning, not clinical decision-making. They may miss nuance or occasionally misstate details from the source, so always read the original paper before applying findings in practice. Nothing on this site is medical advice.