Physle Daily
Sports & Athletic Rehab Randomised controlled trial

The effects of stroboscopic balance training on cortical activities in athletes with chronic ankle instability.

Athletes with chronic ankle instability often struggle with balance control, and rehabilitation approaches increasingly try to challenge the brain's role in motor control, not just the ankle joint itself. This trial looked at whether a 6-week balance training program using stroboscopic glasses, which briefly interrupt visual input, changes brain electrical activity and balance performance compared to the same training without strobe glasses or no training at all. Thirty-nine athletes were split into three groups. The strobe group showed increases in certain brain wave activity (theta and alpha) recorded over the motor cortex area, along with faster center of pressure movement during a single-leg balance test, and these post-training values were higher than in the non-strobe and control groups for some measures.

The findings suggest stroboscopic training may influence cortical activity patterns and balance control differently than standard training, though the study is small and the practical meaning of these brain wave changes for injury risk or function was not tested.

If you've dealt with recurring ankle sprains or instability, you know balance training is often part of recovery, but researchers are still figuring out what actually helps. This study tested whether wearing special strobe glasses, which flash on and off to briefly block vision, during balance training changes how the brain and body respond compared to doing the same exercises without the glasses or doing no training. Athletes who trained with the strobe glasses showed changes in brain activity patterns and moved differently during a balance test afterward, with results that were sometimes higher than the other two groups.

This is an interesting early signal that reducing visual input during training might affect how the brain and body work together for balance, but the study only included 39 people, split into three small groups. That means these results are preliminary, and it's not yet clear whether these changes translate into fewer sprains, better sport performance, or lasting improvement.

This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.

This randomised controlled trial assigned 39 athletes with chronic ankle instability to a strobe balance training group (n=13), a non-strobe balance training group (n=13), or a control group (n=13), evaluating cortical activity via EEG at the Cz electrode and center of pressure velocity during transition from bipedal to single-leg stance on a HUBER balance device before and after a 6-week program. The strobe group demonstrated significant within-group increases in Cz theta (p<0.001), Cz alpha (p=0.003), and center of pressure velocity (p<0.001) from pretest to posttest. Between-group comparisons at posttest showed the strobe group's theta was higher than control (p=0.009), alpha was higher than both non-strobe (p=0.039) and control (p=0.001), and center of pressure velocity was higher than both control (p=0.031) and non-strobe (p=0.03). With only 13 participants per arm, this is a small trial, and the abstract does not report effect sizes, confidence intervals, or functional or injury outcomes, limiting judgments about clinical importance.

The EEG and balance velocity changes are physiological markers rather than validated proxies for reduced re-injury risk, and replication in larger samples with functional follow-up would be needed to establish clinical relevance.

1

In this small trial of 39 athletes with chronic ankle instability, strobe glasses added to balance training were associated with significant within-group increases in cortical theta and alpha activity and balance velocity after 6 weeks.

2

Posttest cortical alpha and balance velocity were significantly higher in the strobe group than in both the non-strobe and control groups, and theta was higher than control alone.

3

With only 13 participants per group and no reported functional or injury outcomes, these findings are preliminary and do not establish whether stroboscopic training reduces re-injury risk or improves sport performance.

Source

Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine

Uzlaşır S, Özdıraz KY, Dağ O et al. · 2021

doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.014

Read paper →
Previously in Sports & Rehab
2026-09-14Comparison of stop-X and knee control training on side cut kinetics in futsal players with dynamic knee valgus: a randomized controlled trial.2026-09-13Effects of Landing Impacts and Running on Balance Error Scoring System Performance.2026-09-12Can We Identify Why Athletes Fail to Return to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Browse the full Sports & Rehab archive →
A note on accuracy

Summaries are AI-generated from each paper's abstract and are for learning, not clinical decision-making. They may miss nuance or occasionally misstate details from the source, so always read the original paper before applying findings in practice. Nothing on this site is medical advice.