Physle Daily
Paediatric Physio Randomised controlled trial

Effect of Pilates exercises on balance and gross motor coordination in children with Down syndrome.

Children with Down syndrome often struggle with balance and motor coordination, and physiotherapists are always looking for ways to sharpen standard exercise programs. This trial asked whether adding Pilates to a designed physical therapy program would help more than the physical therapy program alone. Forty children aged 8 to 10 were randomly split into two groups: one received the standard program, the other received the same program plus Pilates exercises.

Both groups improved on measures of dynamic balance, gross motor coordination, and quality of life after the intervention period, which shows that some benefit came simply from being in physical therapy. But when the two groups were compared against each other, the Pilates group showed significantly greater improvement across all measured outcomes. This is an interesting signal that Pilates may add something beyond standard care, though the trial is small, and details on blinding, dropout, and longer-term follow-up are not reported in the abstract, so the strength and durability of this finding remain uncertain.

If your child has Down syndrome, you may already know that balance and coordination can be extra challenges that affect daily movement and confidence. This study looked at whether adding Pilates exercises to a regular physiotherapy program could help more than physiotherapy alone in children aged 8 to 10 with Down syndrome. Both groups of children, one doing standard physiotherapy and one doing standard physiotherapy plus Pilates, showed improvement in balance, coordination, and quality of life.

However, the children who did Pilates alongside their physiotherapy improved significantly more than those who did physiotherapy alone across every outcome measured. This is a promising early result, but it comes from a small trial of forty children, and the abstract doesn't tell us how long these improvements lasted or whether the children were tracked afterward. Larger and longer studies would help confirm whether this pattern holds and how meaningful it is over time.

This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.

This randomised controlled trial compared a designed physical therapy program alone against the same program plus an added Pilates exercise component in 40 children with Down syndrome aged 8 to 10. Primary outcomes were dynamic balance (Biodex Balance System) and gross motor coordination (Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, second edition), with quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) as a secondary outcome. Both groups improved significantly from baseline on all outcomes, indicating that within-group gains occurred with standard physiotherapy regardless of the Pilates addition.

The between-group comparison favoured the Pilates group across balance, motor coordination, and quality of life measures, with the abstract reporting p<0.0001 for all outcomes, suggesting a consistent statistically significant advantage for the combined intervention. The sample size is modest and the abstract does not report blinding procedures, adherence, adverse events, or long-term follow-up, limiting judgments about generalisability and durability of effect. The trial is registered (NCT05928949), which supports transparency, but confirmation from larger, methodologically detailed trials would be needed before drawing firm conclusions about the added value of Pilates in this population.

1

Both the standard physical therapy group and the physical therapy plus Pilates group showed significant within-group improvements in balance, motor coordination, and quality of life.

2

The group that added Pilates exercises showed significantly greater improvement than the standard physical therapy group alone across all measured outcomes (p<0.0001).

3

This is a small trial of 40 children with limited reported detail on blinding, adherence, or follow-up duration, so the findings should be regarded as preliminary.

Source

Acta neurologica Belgica

Al-Nemr A, Reffat S · 2024

doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02517-w

Read paper →
Previously in Paediatric
2026-08-29Effects of Lifestyle Modification Interventions to Prevent and Manage Child and Adolescent Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2026-08-28Personalized, physiotherapist-guided exercise programs in JIA: home-based vs. immersive virtual reality (JiaFitXR).2026-08-27Gamified Telerehabilitation in Oligoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled, Single-Blind Trial. Browse the full Paediatric archive →
A note on accuracy

Summaries are AI-generated from each paper's abstract and are for learning, not clinical decision-making. They may miss nuance or occasionally misstate details from the source, so always read the original paper before applying findings in practice. Nothing on this site is medical advice.