Physle Daily
Paediatric Physio Randomised controlled trial

Effects of a cognitive-motor dual-task exercise program versus exergaming on cognitive function in children with down syndrome: A single-blinded randomized trial.

Children with Down syndrome often face both motor and cognitive delays, and finding engaging ways to support thinking skills alongside physical activity is an ongoing question in paediatric rehabilitation. This small trial compared two approaches, a cognitive-motor dual-task training programme and an exergaming programme, in children aged 8 to 14 with Down syndrome over eight weeks, using computerised cognitive testing before and after twelve training sessions. Both groups showed improvements over time in reaction speed, error rates during dual-task performance, and a measure linked to inhibitory control, but memory scores did not change and there was no evidence that one programme outperformed the other.

Because both groups improved similarly, the design cannot say whether either specific programme caused the gains, and the sample was very small, with only eleven and twelve children in each group, so these results should be read as preliminary rather than conclusive.

If you're a parent of a child with Down syndrome, you may already know that both movement skills and thinking skills can develop more slowly, and programmes that combine physical activity with mental challenges are being explored as one way to support both. This study looked at two such programmes, one involving structured exercises that combined physical movement with mental tasks, and one using video-game-based exercise, in a small group of children aged 8 to 14 over eight weeks. Children in both groups showed improvements in attention, reaction speed, and the ability to make fewer errors while doing two things at once, but memory scores stayed about the same, and the two programmes produced similar results rather than one being clearly better.

Because there was no separate group that received no training at all, and the study only included 23 children total, it's not possible to say for certain that either programme specifically caused these improvements, or how they compare with children who received no structured programme.

This is a summary of research, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about anything affecting your care.

This randomised trial compared cognitive-motor dual-task training against exergaming in 23 children with Down syndrome aged 8 to 14, using the CANTAB battery adapted for this population, assessed at baseline and after an eight-week protocol comprising twelve 45-minute sessions delivered over six weeks. Significant time effects were reported for reaction time (p<0.01, η²=0.31), error reduction (p=0.01, η²=0.25), single-task errors (p=0.01, η²=0.24), and side block errors (p=0.05, η²=0.17), alongside a significant increase in incongruency latency in both groups (p<0.01, η²=0.33), interpreted as reflecting improved attentional and executive processing. Critically, no significant group-by-time interaction was found for these outcomes and no significant memory effects emerged, meaning the two interventions produced comparable improvements without one demonstrating superiority.

With group sizes of eleven and twelve, and no untrained control arm, these within-group time effects cannot be attributed with confidence to either intervention specifically, and the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating given the small sample and single-blind design.

1

Both cognitive-motor dual-task training and exergaming were associated with improvements over eight weeks in reaction time, error rates, and an inhibitory-control measure, but no significant difference emerged between the two programmes.

2

Memory outcomes did not show significant change in either group, indicating the observed benefits were specific to attention and executive processing rather than broad cognitive gains.

3

With only 23 children split across two small groups and no untrained comparison group, these findings are preliminary and cannot establish that either intervention directly caused the improvements seen.

Source

Psychology of sport and exercise

Algabbani MF, Halwsh SD, Alqabbani S et al. · 2026

doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103190

Read paper →
Previously in Paediatric
2026-09-14The effects of physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercise on idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2026-09-13Social exercise interventions for children who have complex developmental needs: A systematic review.2026-09-12Balancing in Virtual Reality: Motor Learning and Functional Improvement in Down Syndrome. Browse the full Paediatric archive →
A note on accuracy

Summaries are AI-generated from each paper's abstract and are for learning, not clinical decision-making. They may miss nuance or occasionally misstate details from the source, so always read the original paper before applying findings in practice. Nothing on this site is medical advice.